Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.
Identifieur interne : 002052 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002051; suivant : 002053Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.
Auteurs : M. Mercier [France] ; S. Schraub ; D D Bransfield ; J. FournierSource :
- Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation [ 0962-9343 ] ; 1992.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Acceptation des soins par les patients (MeSH), Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Attitude envers la santé (MeSH), Caractéristiques culturelles (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (normes), Femelle (MeSH), France (épidémiologie), Humains (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Qualité de vie (MeSH), Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH), Service hospitalier d'oncologie (MeSH), Stress psychologique (épidémiologie), Stress psychologique (étiologie), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Tumeurs (ethnologie), Tumeurs (psychologie), Études d'évaluation comme sujet (MeSH).
- MESH :
- ethnologie : Tumeurs.
- normes : Enquêtes et questionnaires.
- psychologie : Tumeurs.
- épidémiologie : France, Stress psychologique.
- étiologie : Stress psychologique.
- Acceptation des soins par les patients, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Attitude envers la santé, Caractéristiques culturelles, Femelle, Humains, Mâle, Qualité de vie, Sensibilité et spécificité, Service hospitalier d'oncologie, Sujet âgé, Études d'évaluation comme sujet.
- Wicri :
- geographic : France.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Attitude to Health (MeSH), Cultural Characteristics (MeSH), Evaluation Studies as Topic (MeSH), Female (MeSH), France (epidemiology), Humans (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Neoplasms (ethnology), Neoplasms (psychology), Oncology Service, Hospital (MeSH), Patient Acceptance of Health Care (MeSH), Quality of Life (MeSH), Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH), Stress, Psychological (epidemiology), Stress, Psychological (etiology), Surveys and Questionnaires (standards).
- MESH :
- geographic , epidemiology : France.
- epidemiology : Stress, Psychological.
- ethnology : Neoplasms.
- etiology : Stress, Psychological.
- psychology : Neoplasms.
- standards : Surveys and Questionnaires.
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Cultural Characteristics, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oncology Service, Hospital, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Sensitivity and Specificity.
Abstract
A three-part study evaluated French cancer patients' acceptance of self-rated quality of life measures, the predictive value of these measures, and the agreement between patient and health provider ratings of patient quality of life. In part one, 93% of 137 patients indicated a willingness to complete the Qualite de la Vie-Questionnaire (QOL-Q) and Analogues Lineaires pour la Mesure de la Qualite de vie (LA), and 63.6% indicated a willingness to be interviewed by a psychologist. Willingness to complete the scales was related to hospitalization status and treatment modality. In parts two and three, 100 patients were asked to complete the QOL-Q, LA, the Karnofsky Index (KI) and a side-effects checklist, and to undergo a psychological interview. Following interview, a psychologist rated the patients using the QOL-Q, and classified patient level of emotional distress. Oncologists rated the patient using the KI and the side-effects checklist. The results indicate that the patients' ratings of their quality of life were higher than the psychologist's ratings, and that the QOL-Q has predictive value in identifying severe emotional distress. Low level of patient and physician agreement on the KI was partially explained by patient age and cancer site. A moderate level of agreement was found between patient and physician perceptions of side effects. The study suggests that the QOL-Q, not the LA, may be useful as a screening tool to identify patients with impaired quality of life, and that self-rated measures should be included in quality of life assessments.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00435436
PubMed: 1301115
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.</title><author><name sortKey="Mercier, M" sort="Mercier, M" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="M" last="Mercier">M. Mercier</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>University of Franche-Comte, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Besançon, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Franche-Comte, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Besançon</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region">Franche-Comté</region><settlement type="city">Besançon</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schraub, S" sort="Schraub, S" uniqKey="Schraub S" first="S" last="Schraub">S. Schraub</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bransfield, D D" sort="Bransfield, D D" uniqKey="Bransfield D" first="D D" last="Bransfield">D D Bransfield</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fournier, J" sort="Fournier, J" uniqKey="Fournier J" first="J" last="Fournier">J. Fournier</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1992">1992</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:1301115</idno><idno type="pmid">1301115</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00435436</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002051</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002051</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002051</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002051</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002051</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.</title><author><name sortKey="Mercier, M" sort="Mercier, M" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="M" last="Mercier">M. Mercier</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>University of Franche-Comte, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Besançon, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Franche-Comte, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Besançon</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region">Franche-Comté</region><settlement type="city">Besançon</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schraub, S" sort="Schraub, S" uniqKey="Schraub S" first="S" last="Schraub">S. Schraub</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bransfield, D D" sort="Bransfield, D D" uniqKey="Bransfield D" first="D D" last="Bransfield">D D Bransfield</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fournier, J" sort="Fournier, J" uniqKey="Fournier J" first="J" last="Fournier">J. Fournier</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation</title><idno type="ISSN">0962-9343</idno><imprint><date when="1992" type="published">1992</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Attitude to Health (MeSH)</term><term>Cultural Characteristics (MeSH)</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>France (epidemiology)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Neoplasms (ethnology)</term><term>Neoplasms (psychology)</term><term>Oncology Service, Hospital (MeSH)</term><term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care (MeSH)</term><term>Quality of Life (MeSH)</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH)</term><term>Stress, Psychological (epidemiology)</term><term>Stress, Psychological (etiology)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (standards)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Acceptation des soins par les patients (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Attitude envers la santé (MeSH)</term><term>Caractéristiques culturelles (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (normes)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>France (épidémiologie)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Qualité de vie (MeSH)</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH)</term><term>Service hospitalier d'oncologie (MeSH)</term><term>Stress psychologique (épidémiologie)</term><term>Stress psychologique (étiologie)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Tumeurs (ethnologie)</term><term>Tumeurs (psychologie)</term><term>Études d'évaluation comme sujet (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>France</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Stress, Psychological</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ethnologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ethnology" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Stress, Psychological</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term><term>Stress psychologique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Stress psychologique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Cultural Characteristics</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oncology Service, Hospital</term><term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Acceptation des soins par les patients</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Caractéristiques culturelles</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Qualité de vie</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term><term>Service hospitalier d'oncologie</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Études d'évaluation comme sujet</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A three-part study evaluated French cancer patients' acceptance of self-rated quality of life measures, the predictive value of these measures, and the agreement between patient and health provider ratings of patient quality of life. In part one, 93% of 137 patients indicated a willingness to complete the Qualite de la Vie-Questionnaire (QOL-Q) and Analogues Lineaires pour la Mesure de la Qualite de vie (LA), and 63.6% indicated a willingness to be interviewed by a psychologist. Willingness to complete the scales was related to hospitalization status and treatment modality. In parts two and three, 100 patients were asked to complete the QOL-Q, LA, the Karnofsky Index (KI) and a side-effects checklist, and to undergo a psychological interview. Following interview, a psychologist rated the patients using the QOL-Q, and classified patient level of emotional distress. Oncologists rated the patient using the KI and the side-effects checklist. The results indicate that the patients' ratings of their quality of life were higher than the psychologist's ratings, and that the QOL-Q has predictive value in identifying severe emotional distress. Low level of patient and physician agreement on the KI was partially explained by patient age and cancer site. A moderate level of agreement was found between patient and physician perceptions of side effects. The study suggests that the QOL-Q, not the LA, may be useful as a screening tool to identify patients with impaired quality of life, and that self-rated measures should be included in quality of life assessments.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">1301115</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1993</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0962-9343</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>1</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1992</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Qual Life Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>53-61</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>A three-part study evaluated French cancer patients' acceptance of self-rated quality of life measures, the predictive value of these measures, and the agreement between patient and health provider ratings of patient quality of life. In part one, 93% of 137 patients indicated a willingness to complete the Qualite de la Vie-Questionnaire (QOL-Q) and Analogues Lineaires pour la Mesure de la Qualite de vie (LA), and 63.6% indicated a willingness to be interviewed by a psychologist. Willingness to complete the scales was related to hospitalization status and treatment modality. In parts two and three, 100 patients were asked to complete the QOL-Q, LA, the Karnofsky Index (KI) and a side-effects checklist, and to undergo a psychological interview. Following interview, a psychologist rated the patients using the QOL-Q, and classified patient level of emotional distress. Oncologists rated the patient using the KI and the side-effects checklist. The results indicate that the patients' ratings of their quality of life were higher than the psychologist's ratings, and that the QOL-Q has predictive value in identifying severe emotional distress. Low level of patient and physician agreement on the KI was partially explained by patient age and cancer site. A moderate level of agreement was found between patient and physician perceptions of side effects. The study suggests that the QOL-Q, not the LA, may be useful as a screening tool to identify patients with impaired quality of life, and that self-rated measures should be included in quality of life assessments.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mercier</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Franche-Comte, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Besançon, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schraub</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bransfield</LastName><ForeName>D D</ForeName><Initials>DD</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fournier</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Qual Life Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9210257</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0962-9343</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003466" MajorTopicYN="Y">Cultural Characteristics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005069" MajorTopicYN="N">Evaluation Studies as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005602" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">France</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009369" MajorTopicYN="N">Neoplasms</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000208" MajorTopicYN="N">ethnology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016522" MajorTopicYN="N">Oncology Service, Hospital</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010342" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Acceptance of Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="Y">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013315" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Psychological</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1992</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1992</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1992</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1301115</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/BF00435436</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984;32(6):408-13</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6531504</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Feb 7;82(3):173-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2296045</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):649-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7109748</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 1990 Apr 15;65(8):1864-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2317765</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Dec;70(12):1423-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3539328</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Oncol. 1984 May;2(5):472-83</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6374052</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Gerontol. 1988 Mar;43(2):M25-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3346521</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biometrics. 1975 Sep;31(3):651-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1174623</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Scand J Respir Dis. 1970;51(4):268-75</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">5532709</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(4):425-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3283945</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Res Nurs Health. 1983 Sep;6(3):117-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6556698</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Apr 5;81(7):485-95</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2646455</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981 Jun;7(6):727-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7287533</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(12):585-97</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7309824</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 1980 Apr 15;45(8):2220-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7370963</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(11):1055-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3204415</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bull Cancer. 1983;70(4):284-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6652248</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(9-10):661-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">489706</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer Nurs. 1978 Oct;1(5):373-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">250445</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet. 1976 Apr 24;1(7965):899-900</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">58161</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7459811</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Apr 5;81(7):472-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2921773</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(8):809-17</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3890194</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer Nurs. 1983 Jun;6(3):219-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6552937</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>France</li></country><region><li>Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</li><li>Franche-Comté</li></region><settlement><li>Besançon</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bransfield, D D" sort="Bransfield, D D" uniqKey="Bransfield D" first="D D" last="Bransfield">D D Bransfield</name><name sortKey="Fournier, J" sort="Fournier, J" uniqKey="Fournier J" first="J" last="Fournier">J. Fournier</name><name sortKey="Schraub, S" sort="Schraub, S" uniqKey="Schraub S" first="S" last="Schraub">S. Schraub</name></noCountry><country name="France"><region name="Bourgogne-Franche-Comté"><name sortKey="Mercier, M" sort="Mercier, M" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="M" last="Mercier">M. Mercier</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/AutomedicationFrancoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002052 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002052 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= AutomedicationFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:1301115
|texte= Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:1301115" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AutomedicationFrancoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |